

Due March 8, 2000
| K’iche’ | Tzeltal | Yucatec | Huastec | Gloss | |
| 1. | ra:h | ja | jah | jah- | ‘hot, spicy’ |
| 2. | ri?x | jix | ji?ih | jeh- | ‘old (man)’ |
| 3. | r- | j- | j- | -- | ‘his/her/its’ |
| 4. | raS | jaS | ja?aS | jaS | ‘green’ |
| 5. | war | waj | waj | waj | ‘to sleep’ |
| 6. | ja:x | jah | jah | ja? | ‘sick’ |
| 7. | jaS | jaS | -- | -- | ‘crab, pincers’ |
| 8. | k’aj- | k’aj-
[‘sing’] |
k’aj-
[‘sing, sell’] |
C’aj-
[‘buy’] |
‘to sell’ |
2. There are two possibilities for the reconstruction of the Proto-Mayan consonant that results in this correspondence. What are the two possibilities? For example, in Numic, one possibility for the reconstruction of the [m]/[w] consonant is either that the proto-form is *[m] and that this consonant changes to [w] in Northfork Monachi in some environment, or that the proto-form is *[w] and this consonant changes to [m] in Yerington Paviotso in some environment.
3. What are the conditioning environments for each possible reconstruction?
4. Based on your answers for (3), which reconstruction is the most likely reconstruction for the [r]/[j] correspondence in the Mayan languages? Explain your reasoning.