| " ... Neither a Klein bottle nor a shovel made of silk
could be patented. It had to be a thing, and the thing had to work. Thus,
the rights of invention and authorship adhered to activities in the physical
world. One didn't get paid for ideas, but for the ability to deliver them
into reality. For all practical purposes, the value was in the conveyance
and not in the thought conveyed.
In other words, the bottle was protected, not the wine.
Now, as information enters cyberspace, the native home of Mind, these
bottles are vanishing. With the advent of digitization, it is now possible
to replace all previous information storage forms with one metabottle:
complex and highly liquid patterns of ones and zeros."
The primary objective of copyright is not to reward the labor of authors,
but `[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.' . . . To this
end, copyright assures authors the right to their original expression,
but encourages others to build freely upon the ideas and information conveyed
by a work. . . . This result is neither unfair nor unfortunate. It is the
means by which copyright advances the progress of science and art.
American 'content' industries (producers of movies, photographs and
sound recordings) are lobbying to have the 'fair use' option removed. On
the principle of 'fair use' researchers can at present take, for example,
graphs, tables, illustrations or factual data from copyrighted sources,
for the purpose of scholarly argument or exposition. If the threatened
changes go through, a payment to the copyright-holder (i.e. the publisher,
not the originator) will be levied.
Back
to syllabus
|