![]() |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| INTRODUCTION:
We all have notions of what it means to "speak correctly." On the syntactic level, an example of "speaking correctly" might include avoiding the use of "like" and "you know" as discourse markers. On the morphological level, "speaking correctly" might mean avoiding slang words such as " dude" or "cool." Even on the phonetic level, we have notions of what it means to "speak correctly" in the form of standard vs. non-standard dialects. It is precisely these notions of what is correct vs. incorrect speech that underlies language stereotypes and bias. For example, one reason that African American English is so controversial in the public school system is because some people perceive it as an "incorrect" variation of the English language. Of course, in reality the controversy surrounding AAE is more complicated and ultimately involves issues of race and socio-economic status, but it is at the level of language rather than race or socio-economic status that the mainstream public discourse of this debate primarily exists. READINGS:
HANDOUTS: DISCUSSION: I mentioned in the introduction to this unit that the Queens vowel shift has significant implications for RP? What are these implications? HINT: Think about what the concept of a standard dialect means and whether or not such a concept implies constancy or allows for change. What are broader social implications of accepting a particular dialect as "standard"? |
||||||||