Locke and Berkeley: Topics and readings

Locke

1. Introductory (Locke) (Feb. 25)
Reading: Book 1, Chapter 1 (i.e., 1.1) of the Essay
Purpose of the Essay, sections 2-3; note emphasis on belief and probable opinion, as well as on knowledge and certainty.
Importance of realizing the limits of the understanding, sections 4-6
Note metaphors of candle and sunshine, legs and wings, sailor and his line; reflect on what they mean.

2.Innate Principles (Locke) (Feb 27)
Reading: Book I, Chapter 2 (see also chapter 4)
Descartes's distinction between innate, adventitious and invented ideas. Locke's target is more a matter of attacking innate principles; innate ideas are a target only insofar as innate principles must be made up of innate ideas.
Innateness used to explain the certainty and self-evidentness of a certain class of principle (maxims, postulates, axioms etc).

Locke will show:
1)There is no good argument for innate principles.
2)That there is another account of the origin of our ideas (experience, see Book 2)
3)That there is another explanation of the certainty and self-evidentness of maxims (see his account of intuition in Book 4)

Locke will argue against the two main arguments in favor of innate principles:
1)Universal Consent (sections 2-5)
2)Immediate Consent (sections 17-19)
In between, there is a consideration, and rejection, of the argument that we are only innately disposed to accept principles.

3. Ideas (Mar 3)
Reading: 2.1,2, 8. See also 1.1.8.
The way of ideas: has to provide an alternative to innateness to account for the origin of all our ideas, and for self-evidentness, certainty, knowledge, probability and belief. All this is done in terms of ideas.

2.1 Of Ideas in General
-ideas as the materials of reason and knowledge
-ideas come from experience: sense and reflection

2.2 Of Simple Ideas
-simple vs. complex ideas
-ideas vs. qualities
-can't make a new simple idea

4. Abstract Ideas 
Reading: 2.11.9 (see handout or use link), 2.12.1, 3.3.1-11, 4.7.9 (see handout or use link)
-how ideas can refer to more than one thing: by abstraction

5. Primary and Secondary Qualities (Mar 5)
Reading: 2.8 Some Further Considerations Concerning our Simple Ideas
Ideas vs. Qualities. Former needn't be exact "images and resemblances of the latter."
Ideas as the immediate object of perception; qualities as powers in the object to produce such ideas. Note warning in section 8: when Locke speaks of "ideas" as "in the objects themselves", he is talking about qualities.
Primary Qualities: our ideas of primary qualities resemble the qualities, which cause them
Secondary Qualities: our ideas of secondary qualities have no such resemblance; secondary qualities are "nothing but" powers to produce such ideas.

6. Substance and Essence (Mar 10)
Reading: Substance: 2.12, 2.13.18-20, 2.23.1-23&28-32
Essence: 3.3, 3.6.1.-10
Recall in 2.2.1, simple ideas, considered as ideas were distinct; but considered as qualities appeared united and blended into one object. Locke's concepts of substance and essence attempt to explain this unity and independent existence.

Modes, Substances and Relations
2.12.3
Modes are not taken to represent distinct particular things, subsisting on their own, while substances are. (Recall Descartes' account of substance).
2.13.18-19
The mere concept or idea of substance on its own doesn't explain unity and independence.
2.23.1-2
Substance as substratum, or the idea of "pure substance in general"; confused and obscure
2.23.3
Particular sorts of substance, e.g., gold or men, particular substances (things), eg. a piece of gold or a man

Essence, or what makes a thing what it is
3.3.1-3
Everything that exists is a particular, but most of our names are for classes, sorts or species of things, not individual things. So there is something essentially man-made or conventional about essences, or that which determines classes or species of things.
3.3.15
Real essence: real internal constitution of things
Nominal essence: concept of a thing (complex idea)
3.3.18
modes: real and nominal essence coincide
substances: real and nominal essences are distinct

Knowledge and Opinion (Mar 12 & 24)
Reading: Book IV, chapters 1-3, 9, 11, 14, 15

Locke and Descartes:
-equation of knowledge and certainty
-Locke includes sensitive or perceptual knowledge

Definition of Knowledge (4.1.2):
-the PERCEPTION of the connection or AGREEMENT of any of our IDEAS
-ideas as the materials of knowledge; sounds rationalist, but remember Locke's account of the origin of ideas

Four Types of Agreement (4.1.3-7): identity, relation, necessary connection, real existence

Degrees of Knowledge (4.2): intuitive, demonstrative and sensitive

Sensitive or Perceptual Knowledge (4.9, 4.11))

Opinion and Probable Reasoning (4.14, 4.15)
-judging, rather than perceiving two ideas to agree
-anything that is nether intuitive nor demonstrative, and is beyond the immediate evidence of the senses, is a matter of belief and probability

Epistemic Responsibility
-is knowledge voluntary? -see 4.13 (use link)
-are we responsible for what we believe? see 4.20.1-3 (use link)

Berkeley

1. Abstract Ideas (Mar 26)
Reading: Berkeley: introduction to The Principles of Human Knowledge
-his criticism of abstract ideas

2. Primary and Secondary Qualities (Mar 31)
Reading: The Principles of Human Knowledge, Part One, sections 1-15, the first of Three Dialogues between Hylas and
Philonous
Berkeley's rejection of the distinction between primary and secondary qualities

3. Berkeley's Idealism (Apr 2)
Reading: The Principles of Human Knowledge, Part One, Sections 1-53